<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Phone Bill Disputes &#187; Class Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phonebilldisputes.net/category/class-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phonebilldisputes.net</link>
	<description>Cell Phone &#38; Telephone Overcharges Class Action Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 00:32:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Class Action Charges AT&amp;T</title>
		<link>http://www.phonebilldisputes.net/2009/11/class-action-charges-att/</link>
		<comments>http://www.phonebilldisputes.net/2009/11/class-action-charges-att/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telephone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonebilldisputes.net/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A California company filed a lawsuit charging that it and other telephone customer were unlawfully billed by AT&#38;T through long-distance charges added to their local phone bills.
People who are not AT&#38;T customer are discovering that they are being repeatedly assessed AT&#38;T long-distance charges through their local phone by BellSouth, the company charged.
The problem was not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A California company filed a lawsuit charging that it and other telephone customer were unlawfully billed by AT&amp;T through long-distance charges added to their local phone bills.</p>
<p>People who are not AT&amp;T customer are discovering that they are being repeatedly assessed AT&amp;T long-distance charges through their local phone by BellSouth, the company charged.</p>
<p>The problem was not confined to California.  The Florida Attorney General issued a consumer advisory warning telephone customers that AT&amp;T long distance charges were improperly being added to local phone bills.</p>
<p>According to one person, who tried to closed their account with AT&amp;T, AT&amp;T continued to billed on their closed account anyways.  They tried to clear this up for 8 months but AT&amp;T continued to billed them.</p>
<p>Part of the problem is with AT&amp;T&#8217;s automated system that prevents callers from speaking with a live customer service representative and obstructing consumers from receiving refunds for the improper long distance charges.</p>
<p>The class action lawsuit was filed on August 15, 2003 and asserts claims against AT&amp;T for unlawful, unfair or fraudulent business practices in violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, for unjust enrichment, and for money had and received.</p>
<p>According to the complaint, AT&amp;T unlawfully bills some consumers who are not AT&amp;T customers through their local phone bills, and AT&amp;T&#8217;s computerized billing system continues to assess charges on phone lines not subscribed to AT&amp;T long-distance service even though AT&amp;T&#8217;s own records indicate that there is no AT&amp;T call activity on the phone lines or that AT&amp;T does not provide service to such lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.phonebilldisputes.net/2009/11/class-action-charges-att/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cellphone Usuage Data</title>
		<link>http://www.phonebilldisputes.net/2009/11/cellphone-usuage-data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.phonebilldisputes.net/2009/11/cellphone-usuage-data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 01:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cell Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telephone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phonebilldisputes.net/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Accordingly to the CTIA, an organziation that represents the wireless industry, based on data compiled in the last 6 months:

The average cell phone bill in June 2009 was $49.57, up more than a buck from June 2008;
The average length of a voice call was just 2.03 minutes, shorter than any other year since the CTIA [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Accordingly to the CTIA, an organziation that represents the wireless industry, based on data compiled in the last 6 months:</p>
<ul>
<li>The average cell phone bill in June 2009 was $49.57, up more than a buck from June 2008;</li>
<li>The average length of a voice call was just 2.03 minutes, shorter than any other year since the CTIA started keeping records in 1988;</li>
<li>There are about 276,610,580 wireless subscribers in the U.S., up about 14 million from last year, and more than double the number in 2002;</li>
<li>The various wireless carriers (or at least the ones who reported figures to the CTIA) raked in $151.2 billion in revenue from June 2009 to June 2008—again, more than double what they made in 2002.</li>
</ul>
<p>But the biggest data reviewed was that in the US in the last 6 months, US citizen send an average of 4.1 billion messages each day.  That&#8217;s 11.7 text messages a day for every man, woman, and child in the country.  That is some cool ass statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.phonebilldisputes.net/2009/11/cellphone-usuage-data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

